Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56863/2017bail granted

Sri Ram Singh @ Bittu Singh @ Dipu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-29Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 56863 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -183 Year- 2016 Thana -BARHARA District- BHOJPUR ======================================================

1. Sri Ram Singh @ Bittu Singh @ Dipu Singh S/o Sri Ramnath Singh, R/o Village- Bakhorapur, P.S.- Barhara, in the District- Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhileshwar Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Amrit Anunay, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-11-2017 Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 02.08.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32517 of 2017 with observation that petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that now charge has been framed in this case and the petitioner has been in custody since 03.06.2017 and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him for grant of bail. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts as well as in view of the order dated 02.08.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32517 of 2017, let the petitioner above named, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56863 of 2017 (2) dt.29-11-2017 released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Sessions Trial No. 330 of 2017 arising out of Barhara (Sinha O.P.) P.S. Case No. 183 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the Court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Amit/- U T