Patna High CourtMJC/1433/2016disposed

Rajiv Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-16Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1433 of 2016 ====================================================== Rajiv Kumar Singh @ Rajav Kumar Singh, son of Late Brahma Singh, resident of Village + PO- Hathini, PS- Nokha, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sri Chaitanya Prasad, the Secretary, Cooperative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Ajay Kumar Choudhary, Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Bihar, Patna.

4. Sri Animesh Kumar Prashar, District Magistrate, Rohtas.

5. Sri Nikesh Kumar, the District Cooperative Officer, District- Rohtas.

6. Sri Maksud Alam, Block Cooperative Officer, Rajpur Block, DistrictRohtas.

7. Sri Arun Lal, Block Cooperative Officer, Karakat, District- Rohtas.

8. Sri Mahadeo, Block Cooperative Officer, Nokha, District- Rohtas.

9. Sri Jai Bardhan Singh, Block Cooperative Officer, Bikramganj, District- Rohtas.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Dubey, AC to AAG-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 16-08-2017 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Kumar Dubey, learned Assisting Counsel to Additional Advocate General No.11 appears and informs that in compliance of the order passed on the writ petition notice was issued by the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Bihar, Patna to the petitioner but he has not responded to the notice and as a consequence vide order bearing Memo No.377 dated 25.5.2017 the case had been dismissed for default. He produces a copy of the order bearing Memo No.377 dated 25.5.2017. Let it be taken

Patna High Court MJC No.1433 of 2016 (3) dt.16-08-2017 on record. He submits that this dismissal has also been communicated to the petitioner.

In the circumstances noted above the contempt application requires no persuasion and is accordingly disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U