← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/880/2020disposed

Rina Devi v. Raman Kumar,

2026-03-11Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.880 of 2020 ====================================================== Rina Devi Wife of Triloki Prasad Resident of Baraiya Tola, Ward No. 12, Block Ramgadhwa, Panchayat Ahiroliya, P.O.-Mauje, P.S.-Ramgadhwa, District-East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Raman Kumar, The District Magistrate - Cum - District Collector, East Champaran, Motihari 2.

Rakesh Kumar, The District Program Officer, East Champaran, Motihari. 3.

Amit Kumar, The Sub Divisional Officer, Division Raxaul, District East Champaran, Motihari.

4.

Jai Mala Kumari The Block Child Development Program Officer, Block Ramgardhwa, District-East Champaran, Motihari. 5.

Pinki Kumari Wife of Ratnesh Prasad Resident of Village-Sihorwa, Ward no.11, Arwaliya Panchayat, P.S.-Ramgarhwa, District-East Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sumeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mrs. Kumari Amrita, GP-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 11-03-2026 Heard Mr. Raushan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner who has been instructed by Mr. Sumeet Kumar Singh and learned counsel representing the State.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):

"for initiation of contempt proceeding against the opposite parties/contemnors for violating the order dated 22.08.2019 passed by the Hon'ble Court in CWJC No.16234 of 2019."

Patna High Court MJC No.880 of 2020(3) dt.11-03-2026 2/2

3. The show cause of the opposite party no.4, Child Development Program Officer, Ramgardhwa, East Champaran has been filed and learned State counsel has taken this Court to Annexure-A to show that the Child Development Program Officer has passed the order negating the claim of the petitioner with further observation that she can prefer an appeal before the District Program Officer, East Champaran at Motihari, if she is aggrieved.

4. Having convinced that the order stands complied, the petitioner is granted liberty to agitate the matter, if she so want, the MJC No. 880 of 2020 is disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U