Ajmeri Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55147 of 2017 (2) dt.15-11-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.55147 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -30 Year- 2017 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- ARRARIA ======================================================
1. Ajmeri Khatoon Daughter of Md. Illiyas Resident of Village - Red Light Area, Ward No. 3, P.S. - Forbesganj, Dist - Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2017 Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 04.09.2017, passed in Cr. Misc No. 36036 of 2017, with a liberty to the petitioner that he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that now charge has been framed and petitioner has been in custody since 22.06.2017 and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him for grant of bail.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts and also in view of order dated 04.09.2017, passed in Cr. Misc No. 36036 of 2017, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55147 of 2017 (2) dt.15-11-2017 satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Session Judge, Araria, in connection with Araria Mahila P.S. Case No. 30 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T