Nitish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16095 of 2014 ====================================================== Nitish Kumar Son of Sri Sukhdeo Prasad Singh, resident of village- Telmar, P.O.P.S.- Telmar, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.
The Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna 3.
The Chairman M/S Ekta Manch beside Pranjal Appartment West Boring Canal Road, Patna 4.
The Municipal Commissioner/Executive Officer, Municipal Corporation, Munger 5.
Mahapaur, Munger Municipal Corporation, Munger ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shambhu Sharan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Manish Kumar, GP-8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 19-07-2023 1.
The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "That this appropriate writ/writs is filed for quashing the termination letter no.979/Sa dated 01.07.2014 passed by Municipal Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Munger and contractual basis continuation in service as "Jal-Kal Adhikshak" Munger Municipal Corporation Munger as per his performance evaluation Excellent and recommendation made by the Municipal Commissioner itself dated 01.03.2014 vide letter no. 472/sa to the Special Secretary,
Patna High Court CWJC No.16095 of 2014(2) dt.19-07-2023 2/2 Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna and accordingly the consequential benefit thereon as well as quashing of letter dated 2/6/2014 issued by the Deputy Secretary, Urban Development and housing Department Govt. of Bihar Patna vide letter No. 01/Est. 2. (Misc.) 23/2014,1281/UD & HD."
2.
At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondent-authorities for redressal of his grievances, if any. 3.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed, however, with the aforesaid liberty. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U