Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20593/2024bail granted

Shweta Singh @ Shweta Priyadarshani @ Shweta Priyadarshi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-02Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20593 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-337 Year-2012 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== Shweta Singh @ Shweta Priyadarshani @ Shweta Priyadarshi W/o Amul Singh @ Nishant Ranjan R/O ATARDAH, INDIRA COLONY, P.S. - SADAR MUZAFFARPUR, DIST. - MUZAFFARPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 02-04-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case no. 337 of 2012 registered under sections 367 and 368 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that on the pretext of getting him employment, the petitioner took Rs. 3,00,000 from his son. On not getting him employed, on demand she returned Rs. 1,00,000 but cheated him of Rs. 2,00,000.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. No such

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20593 of 2024(2) dt.02-04-2024 2/3 occurrence has taken place as alleged in the F.I.R. She is in custody since 13.1.2024 and undertakes to cooperate in the case/ trial.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State who submits that the petitioner continued to abscond for a long period.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation against the petitioner in the F.I.R together with the petitioner having remained in custody since 13.1.2024, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case no. 337 of 2012 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur on the following conditions :-

(1) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be the father of the petitioner.

(2) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each date of the case/trial and shall cooperate in the trail.

(3) In case the petitioner is absent on any date for reasons not to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court or the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20593 of 2024(2) dt.02-04-2024 3/3 learned trial Court is of the opinion that the trial is being delayed due to non-cooperation on part of the petitioner, the learned trial Court may cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and take her into the custody till conclusion of the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) Harsh/- U T