Amar Nath Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.60263 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -119 Year- 2017 Thana -MAKER District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Amar Nath Sharma, Son of Late Sakaldev Sharma, Residence of Village Bhar Toli alias Bhat Toli, Police Station- Maker, District- Saran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shambhu Prasad Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S. Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 13-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Maker P.S. Case No. 119 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B)/34 of the IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner. He further submits that the husband of the deceased is already in custody. It appears from para-3 to this petition that the petitioner has clean antecedent. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.60263 of 2017 (2) dt.13-12-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 119 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. XII, Saran at Chapra subject to condition as laid down u/S 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) (bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every dated fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bonds of the petitioner and (3) if the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) khushbu/- U T