Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51486/2017bail granted

Chhotan Das v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-09Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51486 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -62 Year- 2017 Thana -PURNAHIA District- SHEOHAR ====================================================== Chhotan Das, Son of Late Mahendra Das, Resident of VillageBasantpatti. P.S.-Purnahiya, District-Sheohar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 10.08.2017 in connection with Purnahiya P.S. Case No. 62 of 2017 for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 386, 387, 389, 427, 440, 436, 455, 457, 354, 354(A) and 448 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the F.I.R. is against 19 named persons and 200 other men and women. The petitioner has been implicated merely as a member of mob and overt act has been attributed to him. The injuries said to have been suffered by the informant is simple in nature. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51486 of 2017 (2) dt.09-11-2017 (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar, in connection with Purnahiya P.S. Case No. 62 of 2017, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

Md. Ibrarul/- (Vikash Jain, J) U T