Patna High CourtL.P.A/1167/2016dismissed

Sri Kailash Kumar Das And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-06Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1167 of 2016 ===========================================================

1. Sri Kailash Kumar Das, age about 50 Years Son of late Ananni Harizan resident of Village-Nagrah, P.S. Naugachiya, District Bhagalpur Pin Code 853204

2. Sri Akhilesh Harizan aged about 45 years Son of late Anan Harizan resident of Village-Nagrah, P.S. Naugachiya, District Bhagalpur Pin Code 853204

3. Aghauri Harizan, son of Late Moti Das, resident of Village- Nagrah, P.SNaugachiya, District-Bhagalpur. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Collector, Bhagalpur.

3. The Additional collector, Bhagalpur.

4. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms Naugachiya, Bhagalpur.

5. The Circle Officer, Naugachiya, District Bhagalpur.

6. Upendra Mandal Son of Sita Ram Mandal.

7. Chhatu Mandal son of Upendra Mandal.

Both resident of Village- Nargarh (Tula Jonia), P.S. Naugachiya, DistrictBhagalpur.

8. Ramu Sahu

9. Dhaneshwar Pd. Sahu

10. Satyan Narayan Sahu all sons of Late Ram Chandra Sah, residents of Village- Basantpur Khara, Sahu Parwatta, P.S. Sahu Parwatta, District- Bhagalpur.

11. Hakim Yadav son of Late Sitabi Yadav, resident of VIllage- Jahagirpur Basi Chui, P.S.- Gopalpur, District- Bhagalpur.

12. Jodi Yadav son of Bhumi Yadav, resident of Village- Jahagirpur, Baisi Chu, P.S.- Gopalpur, District- Bhagalpur.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Satish Kumar Agrawal, Adv. For the Respondent nos.6&7 : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri, Adv. For the Respondent nos.11&12 : Mr.Amrendra Kumar Pathak, Adv. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 06-11-2017 Heard counsel for the parties.

Perused the order dated 18.04.2016. Since the Bataidari is not inheritable right, the claim of these petitioners that they are

Patna High Court LPA No.1167 of 2016 dt.06-11-2017 Bataidars and the order of the D.C.L.R., declaring the private respondent nos.6 and 7 to be Bataidar, is erroneous, is misplaced. Appeal has no merit. It is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 07.11.2017 Transmission Date