← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19314/2025disposed

Raj Tilak Singh @ Sumit Singh @ Raj Tilak @ Sumit v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-02Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19314 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2019 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Raj Tilak Singh @ Sumit Singh @ Raj Tilak @ Sumit S/O Ashok Singh Resident of Village- Tajiyapur, P.S- Pipra, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Saneeta Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 02-05-2025 The present petition is by way of repeated attempts on behalf of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Turkauliya (Banjariya) P.S. Case No. 206 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 324, 307, 120B, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, inasmuch as all the petitions filed earlier for grant of bail have stood rejected.

2.

In pursuance to the earlier order of this Court dated 4.4.2025, the learned Court of District & Additional Sessions Judge-II, East Champaran at Motihari has submitted a letter dated 8.4.2025 wherein it has been stated that out of six chargesheeted witnesses, four witnesses have already been examined and now only two witnesses i.e. the Investigating Officer and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19314 of 2025(3) dt.02-05-2025 2/2 the Doctor are remaining to be examined, hence, some time be granted to conclude the trial.

3.

In view of the aforesaid, the learned Trial Court is requested to ensure completion of examination / crossexamination of the remaining witnesses within a period of four weeks from today and thereafter conclude the trial within a period of six months positively.

4.

It is needless to state that the petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court for grant of regular bail in case the trial is not concluded within a period of six months from today. 5.

Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed off as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U T