Vikash Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20744 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2018 Thana- KATORIYA District- Banka ====================================================== Vikash Kumar Yadav, aged 22 years (male), Son of Suresh Yadav Resident of Village - Dadnagar, Police Station - Katoriya, District - Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Mukherjee For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Anita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-10-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Katoria P.S. Case No. 21 of 2018 (GR No. 475 of 2018) registered for offences under sections 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution story in short is that at about 8.30 PM in the night, when the Informant along with his brother and son reached at Karjhausa Chowk then four persons surrounded them and snatched Rs. 15,000/-.

The name of the petitioner has transpired during investigation of the case. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody for about 9 months.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20744 of 2020(5) dt.12-10-2020 2/2 case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Successor Court, Banka in connection with Katoria P.S. Case No. 21 of 2018, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T