Amarendra Yadav @ Kari Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.54402 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -570 Year- 2017 Thana -MADHEPURA District- MADHEPURA ======================================================
1. Amarendra Yadav @ Kari Yadav S/o Late Munsi Yadav, R/o VillageBhelwaward, No.3, P.S. and District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ashok Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Madhepura P.S.Case nO.570 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, 307,354, 504, 379/34 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner is not named in the FIR. The case is under Section 302 of the IPC.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is nothing against the petitioner and he is in custody for more than three months.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54402 of 2017 (2) dt.16-11-2017 2/2 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Madhepura in connection with Madhepura P.S.Case No.570 of 2017.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T