Fasihur Rahman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23430 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9054 Year-2023 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Fasihur Rahman S/O Nebiur Rahman R/O Ward No. 32, Agarwa, P.S- Town Thana, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Jainab Fatima W/O Fasihur Rahman, D/O Wali Haidar Khan R/O Shakoor Colony, Yusuf Masjid, Engineer Colony, P.S- Shastri Nagar, Distt.- Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Asfar Imam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .

2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 498 (A) of the IPC . 3 . The prosecution case in brief, is that the marriage of complainant Jainab Fatima was solemnized with Faishur Rahman on 05.11.2022 and after some time of marriage , all the accused persons including this petitioner started demanding

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23430 of 2025(3) dt.07-07-2025 2/3 dowry and due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry , victim was subjected to cruelty and harassment. It is further alleged that on 26.01.2023, accused persons finally ousted the victim from her matrimonial house .

4. By filing a supplementary affidavit, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the dispute between the parties has been compromised, and in this regard, a joint compromise petition has been filed in the Court of Learned Court of Additional Session Judge XXVI Patna, in which the petitioner has paid Rs. 13,00,000/- to the complainant (OP No. 2) as a onetime settlement, i.e.,. Annexure - 2 to the supplementary affidavit.

5 . Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail petition .

6 Considering the fact that dispute between the parties has settled by way of filing Joint Compromise petition in the Court below and other circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned JM 1st Class Patna in connection Complaint Case No. 9054 (C) of 2023 ,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23430 of 2025(3) dt.07-07-2025 3/3 subject to the conditions laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 .

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T