← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18733/2022bail granted

Baliram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-22Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18733 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-321 Year-2020 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

BALIRAM YADAV S/o Rajdeo Yadav R/o village- Dalli Bigha, P.S.- Belaganj, P.O.- Belaganj, District- Gaya 2.

ARVIND YADAV S/o Late Sheyamdeo Yadav R/o village- Dalli Bigha, P.S.- Belaganj, P.O.- Belaganj, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 60 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18733 of 2022(2) dt.22-04-2022 2/3 allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. It is alleged that 60 liters wine is recovered from the bank of river. The names of the petitioners have transpired on the basis of disclosure made by Chowkidar. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioners in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the order dated 13.04.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 626 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari versus State of Bihar).

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R./complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Court No. 2, Gaya in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18733 of 2022(2) dt.22-04-2022 3/3 down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T