← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18634/2016disposed

Bidya Nand Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-09-05Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18634 of 2016 =========================================================== Bidya Nand Ram, Son of Late Raghuni Ram, Resident of Village- Dhurgaon, P.O. Dhurgaon, P.S. Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P.) District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Secretary, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa.

6. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Koshi Division, Saharsa.

7. The District Magistrate, Madhepura.

8. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Madhepura.

9. The District Education Officer, Madhepura.

10. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Madhepura.

11. The District Programme Officer (Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan), Madhepura.

12. The Block Education Officer, Madhepura.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarnath Jha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.N. Sharma, A.C. to A.G. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 05-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 29.10.2016 issued under the signature of the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Madhepura, whereby and where-under, on

Patna High Court CWJC No.18634 of 2016 dt.05-09-2017 2/2 administrative ground the petitioner has been transferred from Abhyas Middle School to the upgraded Middle School, Amauna Bisanpur, Block-Gualpara, District- Madhepura. This Court does not find any illegality in the impugned order as it is an administrative order. The petitioner, if so advised, may file a representation before the competent authority. If such a representation is filed by the petitioner, the authority concerned will be obliged to look into the grievance of the petitioner and pass order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of representation by the petitioner. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 12.09.2017 Transmission Date N/A