← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19957/2019bail granted

Surajdeo Sao @ Suryadeo Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2019-04-02Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19957 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-899 Year-2018 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

Surajdeo Sao @ Suryadeo Prasad Son of Late Shankar Sao Resident of Mohalla - Kako More, P.S. and District - Jehanabad 2.

Damodar Sao Son of Late Shankar Sao Resident of Mohalla - Kako More, P.S. and District - Jehanabad 3.

Awadhesh Sao Son of Shankar Sao Resident of Mohalla - Kako More, P.S. and District - Jehanabad 4.

Pramod Kumar Son of Awadhesh Sao Resident of Mohalla - Kako More, P.S. and District - Jehanabad 5.

Rama Shankar Sao Son of Late Narayan Sao Resident of Mohalla - Kako More, P.S. and District - Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Paras Nath For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case, in short, is that the accused persons assaulted the informant while he was returning to his village.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19957 of 2019(2) dt.02-04-2019 2/2 the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. There is a case and counter case between the parties. The injury on the accused side has not been explained by the prosecution. The prosecution has not come with clean hands.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R./complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Judge-I, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 899 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T