Jaglal Sada And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37480 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -17 Year- 2011 Thana -PIPRA District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Jaglal Sada, S/o Karu Sada

2. Raudi Sada, S/o Kari Sada

3. Mishrilal Sada, S/o Jhapat Sada

4. Ravindra Sada, S/o Chathru Sada

5. Ravi Sada

6. Mithun Sada ,Both are sons of Ramdeo Sada

7. Pramod Sada, S/o Saryug Sada

8. Pawan Sada, S/o Shyam Deo Sada, All are R/O/V- Rajpur, Tola - Bhurhi, P.S. - Pipra, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K., Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. M.K.Gautam(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 26-03-2015 All the petitioners figured as accused in Pipra P.S. Case No.17 of 2011 for committing the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 379 and 384 I.P.C.

Apprehending arrest, the petitioners filed A.B.P. No.19/14 before the court of the Sessions Judge, Saharsa. The same was dismissed on 7.7.2014. Hence, this application for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37480 of 2014 (2) dt.26-03-2015 2/2 The allegation against the petitioners is that they have brutally assaulted the informant.

It is way back in March, 2011 that the case was registered and since then the petitioners are at large. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioners were declared absconders. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but at the same time, the petitioners can surrender before the trial Court, which, in turn, considers the feasibility of granting bail to them on the same day taking necessary undertaking from them to appear before the concerned Police Station in connection with the investigation. Hence, the application is rejected, with the observation that in case the petitioners appear before the trial court within two weeks from today in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No.17 of 2011, the trial court shall consider the feasibility of granting bail imposing necessary conditions, such as, that the petitioners shall appear before the concerned Police Station in connection with the investigation. (L. Narasimha Reddy,CJ) PNM U T