Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46912 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -97 Year- 2018 Thana -BARUN District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Singh, S/o Dhrub Kumar Singh, R/o VillageMohanganj, P.S.- Barun, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lal Bahadur Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Asha Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 25-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Barun P.S. Case No.97 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 332, 333, 353, 395, 436, 504, 120(B) Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act.

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that although petitioner is named in the written report, but there is no any allegation of specific overt act against him. In the written report, it is alleged that one person died in a vehicular accident. Thereafter several persons assembled and blocked the road causing obstruction in discharge of official work.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46912 of 2018 (2) dt.25-08-2018 2/2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Barun P.S. Case No.97 of 2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C.

with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- Rohit Kr.

U T