Laxman Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19756 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2018 Thana- BASANHI District- Saharsa ====================================================== LAXMAN YADAV Son of late Awadh Yadav @ Abadh Yadav Resident of Village - Nasi Tola, Mangwar, P.s- Basnahi, Distt.- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 385 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, bears no criminal antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the aforesaid case. He submits that there is no specific allegation upon the petitioner and he has been dragged due to dirty village politics. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 07.01.2019. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19756 of 2019(4) dt.26-06-2019 2/2 the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.- III, Saharsa in connection with Basnahi Police Station Case No. 79 of 2018, subject to the conditions:

(I) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(II) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below. (III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T