Patna High CourtMJC/3406/2014dismissed

Kaushal Kishore Suman v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-10Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3406 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22539 of 2012 ======================================================

1. Kaushal Kishore Suman S/o Shri Jaglal Singh resident of village - Muksudpur, P.O. Nilkanthpur, P.S. Mahua, District - Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Education Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur

3. The District Programme Officer ( Establishment ), Vaishali at Hajipur

4. The Block Development officer, Mahua Block, District Vaishali

5. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Rampur Chandravan @ Dagru, Block Mahua, District Vaishali

6. The Headmaster, Primary School Milki Fatehpur Block Mahua, District Vaishali

7. The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Vaishali at Hajipur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ga-1 S.K. Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-05-2017 The present application has been filed seeking recall of the order, dated 01.04.2014, passed in CWJC No. 22539 of 2012. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Court missed to take into account the fact that no formal order of cancellation of appointment was ever issued.

I do not find any substance in the submissions so advanced on behalf of the petitioner. The said order, dated 01.07.2014, is based on admitted fact that the petitioner had qualification of Madhyama Vishrad acquired from Hindi Sahitya

Sammelen, Allahabad, which is not a recognized qualification for appointment as teacher.

Since the petitioner did not have the basic qualification for appointment or absorption as Panchayat Teacher, I do not find any reason to accede to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner in the present application.

This application has no merit and it is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ArunKumar/- U