← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19282/2026bail granted

Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-31Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19282 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2024 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar S/o- Arjun Bind @ Kabir Bind Village- Shahpur PS- Parash Bigha District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

XXX S/o- YYY R/v- Yarpur Banglapar Po- Pinjour Ps- Parash Bigha DistJehanabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 31-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Special POCSO Case No. 134 of 2024 arising out of Parashbigha P.S. Case No. 02 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 363, 366 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 8 of the POCSO Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have abducted the victim.

4. The petitioner in custody since 11.10.2024.

5. From the impugned order, it appears that the victim had travelled to Chennai with the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19282 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026 2/2

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application is allowed.

7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned Court below in connection with Special POCSO Case No. 134 of 2024 arising out of Parashbigha P.S. Case No. 02 of 2024.

8. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U