Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51324/2017bail granted

Vijay Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-09Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51324 of 2017 (2) dt.09-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51324 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -334 Year- 2017 Thana -FATUHA District- PATNA ====================================================== Vijay Pandey S/o Sri Radhe Kishun Pandey, R/o Village- Rampur, P.S.- Ara Muffasil, in the District of Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 26.08.2017 in connection with Fatuah P.S. Case No. 334 of 2017 for the alleged offences under Sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and no recovery has been made from his possession. Recovery of the stolen articles have been made from co-accused Ranjit Kumar Paswan and Vikky Kumar Paswan who have been granted bail.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Divya Nita, learned J.M. Ist Class, Patna City in connection with Fatuah P.S. Case No. 334 of 2017 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51324 of 2017 (2) dt.09-11-2017 (ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T