Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18201/2026bail granted

Vishal Kumar @ Munna Kumar @ Munna v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-07Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18201 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-478 Year-2025 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Vishal Kumar @ Munna Kumar @ Munna Son of Birendra Mahto R/oTamtam Parao (Padab) Utari Sangat P.s- Phulwari Sharif (Fulwarisharif) District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 07-05-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case no.478 of 2025 registered under sections 305 and 112(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that he has been working for the last five years as a Store Manager. On 26.7.2025, upon opening the store in the morning, it transpired that the lock of the shutter had been broken and a theft had taken place of electronic goods including phones belonging to the company Apple and Samsung etc., details of which has been given in the FIR.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18201 of 2026(3) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 FIR was registered against unknown. The petitioner was falsely implicated in the case in course of investigation on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused made before police. No incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner's possession and the reason for his implication is his antecedents. He is in custody since 27.11.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the FIR, no incriminating article having been recovered from his possession, his being in custody since 27.11.2025 and chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case no.478 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M-II, Danapur, District-Patna.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T