Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61686/2017bail granted

Ravi Sharma v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-12-19Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.61686 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -890 Year- 2013 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ======================================================

1. Ravi Sharma S/o Harinath Sharma, R/o Rusulpur, Ranipur, P.O.- Jhauganj, P.S.- Mehandiganj, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Anshu Kumari D/o Sri Dhrub Narayan Sharma, W/o- Ravi Sharma, R/o Mohalla- Ranipur, P.O.- Jhauganj, P.S.- Mehandiganj, District- Patna at present Address R/o Village- Mirdahachak, P.O.- Majhouli, P.S.- Salimpur, District- Patna.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Pradhan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amrendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 323, 324, 498A, and 380 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of D.P. Act.

The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 01.09.2017. The charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. The petitioner has got no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.61686 of 2017 (2) dt.19-12-2017 2/2 criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Barh at Patna, in connection with Complaint Case No. 890© of 2013. (Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T