← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60200/2017bail granted

Md. Fakhruddin v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-12-11Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.60200 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -980 Year- 2012 Thana -MADHEPURA COMPALINT CASE DistrictMADHEPURA ====================================================== Md. Fakhruddin, S/O Md. Kalam, R/V- Murliganj, Ward No. 1, Kashipur, P.S. Murliganj, District-Madhepura.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Wahida Khatoon, W/O Md. Fakhruddin and daughter of Md. Harun, at present residing at Village- Ranipatti Singan, P.S. Murliganj, DistrictMadhepura. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Nityanand Tiwary, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody since 25.12.2016 in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A) of the IPC and 4 of the D.P. Act.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.60200 of 2017 (2) dt.11-12-2017 2/2 case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Madhepura, in connection with Complaint Case No. 980 of 2012. U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T