← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27301/2024bail granted

Indrajeet Kumar @ Indrajeet Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-28Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27301 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-336 Year-2022 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Indrajeet Kumar @ Indrajeet Singh S/o Late Ram Naresh Singh R/o vill - Vakhari, P.S. - Dhanarua, Distt. - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Rakesh Kumar S/o Suresh Prasad Singh R/o vill - Abdulachak, P.S. - Sampatchak (Gopalpur), Distt. - Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Rabindra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-08-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a complaint case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 406, 341, 323, 504 and 508 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the complainant in brief is that this petitioner entered into an agreement with complainant to sell a property in respect of which Rs. 17,71,000/- was paid through cheque and R.T.G.S. by the complainant. It is alleged that despite taking the consideration money, this petitioner refused to execute the sale deed in favour of complainant and also failed to return the said amount.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that from bare perusal of the complaint

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27301 of 2024(3) dt.28-08-2024 2/2 petition it is apparent that dispute involved in the present complaint case is with regard to sell and purchase of land, which is purely civil in nature. None of the acts allegedly committed by this petitioner would give rise to any criminal liability. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, nature of dispute between the parties and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Masaurhi, Patna, in connection with Complaint Case No. 336 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T