Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17794/2025dismissed

Md. Subhan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-23Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17794 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2024 Thana- MANSAHI District- Katihar ====================================================== Md. Subhan, Son of Md. Abdul @ Md. Abul, Resident of Mohalla - Hawa Mahal, Sharifganj, Ward No.42, P.S. - Muffasil, District - Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-07-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Mansahi P.S. Case No. 126 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and others are accused of brutally killing the deceased by stabbing and strangulating him. During investigation materials have come to connect the petitioner with the crime.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not named by the co-accused in para 100 of the case diary. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the informant will produce the witnesses on the date fixed in the trial after framing of charge so that the trial will conclude.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17794 of 2025(4) dt.23-07-2025 2/2 Petitioner is in custody since 18.12.2024.

5. Learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that all the accused persons have brutally killed the deceased.

6. Considering the brutal murder of the deceased and the materials available against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this application for regular bail is hereby rejected.

7. If the trial is delayed by the prosecution, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) khushbu/- U T