← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20060/2026bail granted

Rabindra Yadav @ Rabindra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-08Mr. Justice Praveen Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20060 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2025 Thana- AMJOR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Rabindra Yadav @ Rabindra Singh Son of Brij Yadav @ Rambrich Yadav R/o Village - Nayagaon, P.S. - Amjhor, Dist. - Rohtas. 2.

Arun Yadav @ Arun Kumar Son of Brij Yadav @ Rambrich Yadav R/o Village - Nayagaon, P.S. - Amjhor, Dist. - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case in connection with Amjhor P.S. Case No. 109 of 2025 dated 20.11.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 117(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the allegation, these two petitioners are alleged to have assaulted on the head of injured Chhatiya Devi with iron rod due to which she became unconscious and fell on the ground.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20060 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/2 that petitioners are agnates and there is land dispute between the parties. It has further been submitted that the occurrence took place in the backdrop of land dispute and the injury sustained by the injured Chhathiya Devi is simple in nature. It has further been submitted that there is no premeditation to kill as the occurrence took place suddenly. It has further been submitted that petitioners have got one criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Rohtas in connection with Amjhor P.S. Case No. 109 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Praveen Kumar, J) shivam/- U T