Sanjeev Kumar @ Saurav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18789 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-589 Year-2018 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== SANJEEV KUMAR @ SAURAV KUMAR Son of Umesh Singh @ Umesh Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Ramdiri, Mahajee Tola, P.S.- Matihani, Dist.- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arjun Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-06-2020 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner during investigation to connect him with the alleged offence. Petitioner has not been put on test identification parade (TIP) till date. Similarly situated co-accused Sumit Kumar has already been allowed bail by a bench of this Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18789 of 2020(2) dt.04-06-2020 2/2 vide order dated 4.12.2019, passed in Cr.Mis.No. 66596/2019. Petitioner is in custody since 22.3.2019.

Considering the facts of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Mufassil (Lakho) Police Station Case No. 589 of 2018 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T