Bhola Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20074 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-669 Year-2021 Thana- KUDHNI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.
BHOLA RAM SON OF LATE JAGESAR RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - KHARONA DIH, P.S. - KURHANI, DISTT. - MUZAFFARPUR 2.
KIRAN DEVI WIFE OF BHOLA RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - KHARONA DIH, P.S. - KURHANI, DISTT. - MUZAFFARPUR ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arun Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Atul Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 16-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 341, 323, 304B, 201 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The allegation against the petitioners along with others is of killing the daughter of the informant due to nonfulfillment of dowry demand.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. They have committed no offence. He submitted that the petitioner no. 1 is the father-in-law and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20074 of 2023(4) dt.16-10-2023 2/2 petitioner no. 2 is the mother-in-law of the deceased. He submitted that the deceased was always remaining in depression and was not living happily in the family and she committed suicide and the allegation that the petitioners were torturing and making demand of dowry is totally false and concocted. No specific overt act against these petitioner only on the basis of suspicion they have been implicated in the present case. They are languishing in judicial custody since 08.08.2022.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-1st (west), Muzaffarpur in connection with Kudhni P.S. Case No. 669 of 2021.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T