Raja Sah @ Raja Ram Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29294 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2020 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

RAJA SAH @ RAJA RAM SAH S/O LAT KESHWAR SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KANCHANPUR, P.S-SASARAM (M) DISTRICT-ROHTAS 2.

SUKHARI SAH @ PRAVESH SAH S/O LAT KESHWAR SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KANCHANPUR, P.S-SASARAM (M) DISTRICT-ROHTAS 3.

LALLU SAH S/O RAJA SAH @ RAJA RAM SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KANCHANPUR, P.S-SASARAM (M) DISTRICT-ROHTAS 4.

HARE RAM SAH S/O RAJA SAH @ RAJA RAM SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KANCHANPUR, P.S-SASARAM (M) DISTRICT-ROHTAS 5.

PRAMOD SAH S/O SUKHARI SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KANCHANPUR, P.S-SASARAM (M) DISTRICT-ROHTAS 6.

DHANJI SAH S/O SUKHARI SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KANCHANPUR, P.S-SASARAM (M) DISTRICT-ROHTAS 7.

SONU SAH S/O HIRA LAL SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KANCHANPUR, P.S-SASARAM (M) DISTRICT-ROHTAS 8.

SUKHA SAH S/O KESHWAR SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KANCHANPUR, P.S-SASARAM (M) DISTRICT-ROHTAS ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29294 of 2021(2) dt.08-02-2022 2/3 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of snatching golden locket from the wife of the informant.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no recovery from the conscious or constructive possession of the petitioners. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and there is general and omnibus allegation against all the petitioners. Petitioners have clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Sasaram, District- Rohtas in connection with Sasaram (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 203 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29294 of 2021(2) dt.08-02-2022 3/3 under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) brajesh kumar/- U T