Sachchidanand Prasad @ Sachchidanand Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.59159 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -114 Year- 2017 Thana -CHANDI District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Sachchidanand Prasad @ Sachchidanand Singh .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

State of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 13-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Chandi P.S. Case No. 114 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-467, 468, 471, 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged in the written report that one Nitish Kumar was trying to open the account on the basis of forged Adhar Card and PAN Card in the name of Santosh Kumar. Learned Sessions Judge has mentioned in the impugned order that name of the petitioner has been taken by the co-accused Nitish Kumar in his confessional statement before the police after being arrested as mentioned in paragraph-16 of the case diary.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59159 of 2017 (3) dt.13-12-2017 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Chandi P.S. Case No. 114 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Hilsa, Nalanda subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T