← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/558/2024dismissed

Shyam Babu Ram v. The State Of Bihar Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Home (Police), Dept. Bihar, Patna

2025-05-05Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.558 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-597 Year-2022 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== Shyam Babu Ram SON OF Bhuneshwar Ram VILLAGE -MUNNICHAK (MUNDICHAK), PS -GAURICHAK DISTRICT- PATNA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Home (Police), Dept. Bihar, Patna Bihar 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayat Raj Dept. Govt. Of Bihar, Patna Bihar 3.

The Principal Secretary, Rural Development, Bihar, Patna Bihar 4.

The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna Bihar 5.

The Inspector General Of Police, Central Area, Patna Bihar 6.

The Senior Superintendent Of Police, Patna Bihar 7.

The District Magistrate, Patna Bihar 8.

The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Patna Bihar 9.

The Block Panchayat Raj Officer, Punpun , Distt- Patna Bihar 10.

The Officer-In-Charge Gaurichak Ps- Punpun, Distt- Patna Bihar 11.

Sri Uday Kumar The Then Block Development Officer, Punpun, DisttPatna Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rabindra Kumar For the Respondent/s :

A.A.G 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-05-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The present application has been filed for issuing a direction upon the respondents concerned to make respondent no.11, the then Block Development Officer, Punpun, Patna accused in Gaurichak P.S. case No.597 of 2022, registered for the offence under Section 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.558 of 2024(2) dt.05-05-2025 2/2 and for any other reliefs for which the petitioner is found entitled to.

3. In my opinion, this is a mala fide writ at the instance of the petitioner which cannot be entertained. Accordingly, it stands dismissed.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) shikha/- U T