Ranjana Gupta v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17561 of 2016 ===========================================================
1. Ranjana Gupta D/o Late Ram Lal Gupta resident of C/o- Dr. M.P. Tripathi, 93A, Bari Path, Musallahpur, Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar.
2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Social Welfare Department through Principal Secretary, Government of Bihar.
4. The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5. The Director, ICDS Directorate, Bihar, Patna.
6. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Madhepura.
7. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, East Champaran.
8. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Saran, Chapra.
9. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Arwal.
10. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Gaya.
11. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Darbhanga.
12. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Patna.
13. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Nawada.
14. The District Program Officer (ICDS), Madhepura.
15. The District Program Officer (ICDS), East Champaran.
16. The District Program Officer (ICDS), Saran, Chapra.
17. The District Program Officer (ICDS), Arwal.
18. The District Program Officer (ICDS), Gaya.
19. The District Program Officer (ICDS), Darbhanga.
20. The District Program Officer (ICDS), Patna.
21. The District Program Officer (ICDS), Nawada.
22. The Director, General Provident Fund Directorate, Pant Bhawan, Patna.
23. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Krishna Chandra Jha, A.C. to AAG-8 For the Accountant General : Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, Adv. ======================== =================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Accountant General. 2.
In view of the specific assertion made in the counter
Patna High Court CWJC No.17561 of 2016 dt.24-07-2017 2/2 affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent nos.4 and 5 that full pension, full gratuity, leave encashment and GPF for the period 200809 and 2009-10 have already been sanctioned and amount of Group Insurance has been credited to the account of the petitioner, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the authorities concerned in respect of any other remaining grievances. In case such a representation is filed, it is expected that the respondents would consider the same and dispose it of by a reasoned order.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Pradeep/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 25-07-2017 Transmission Date