Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55567/2017rejected

Sanjay Singh @ Sadhu Singh @ Sanjay Kr.Singh @ Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-02Mr. Justice Arun Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55567 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -8 Year- 2017 Thana -PALIGANJ District- PATNA ======================================================

1. SANJAY SINGH @ SADHU SINGH @ SANJAY KR.SINGH @ SANJAY KUMAR Son of Late Kamal Dev Singh, R/o Village- Bibipur, P.S.- Paliganj, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manager Sah, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Paliganj P. S. Case No. 08 of 2017, registered under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 134 of the Indian Penal Code. Later on, Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code has been added. Allegation in brief is that the petitioner armed with hammer and son of the petitioner Tutu Kumar armed with pistol caught hold the petitioner and the petitioner assaulted gave hammer blow on his head and Tutu Singh brutally assaulted with the butt of pistol to the father of the informant, who succumbed to injuries during treatment.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55567 of 2017 (4) dt.02-02-2018 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation of assault over the head of the deceased is alleged against two persons but the police has not found involvement of the petitioner's son which causes suspicion regarding the genesis of the occurrence.

Learned counsel for the A.P.P. submits that there is allegation of giving assault over the head of the deceased with the hammer by the petitioner and corresponding injuries were found. Having considered the said facts, circumstances and in view of specific allegation against the petitioner, his prayer for bail stands rejected at this stage.

The petitioner is in jail custody since 18.01.2017 so, the Court is directed to expedite the trial and preferably to conclude the same by a year. If, it is not concluded within the stipulated period, the petitioner may renew prayer for bail. (Arun Kumar, J) Sudha/- U T