Rohit Kumar @ Rohit v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18968 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-316 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== Rohit Kumar @ Rohit S/o Raj Kumar Mukhiya R/o vill - Bhithsari, ward no. 12, P.s.- Bhagwanpur, Distt.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-04-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109(1), 132, 121(1), 121(2), 125(a), 125(b), 221, 192, 61(2), 263, 324(4) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case under the Excise Act and is a young boy aged about 23 years and in sum and substance the allegation is that under the leadership of Ramprit, a mob gathered for freeing the apprehended accused involved in liquor trade and the accused were identified based on video footage.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18968 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026 2/3
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case with general and omnibus allegation. It is also submitted that petitioner resides nearby the place of occurrence, as such, when ruckus was being created, he out of inquisitiveness came to the place of occurrence and thereafter came to be implicated. It is also submitted that petitioner is a young boy and in the nature of allegation if he sent to judicial custody, his entire career would get jeopardized and chances are bright that he may come in contact with hardened criminals.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Bhagwanpur P. S. Case No.316 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. with a further condition that one
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18968 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026 3/3 of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father namely, Raj Kumar Mukhiya.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T