Mohan Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20676 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-175 Year-2019 Thana- JOGAPATTI District- West Champaran ====================================================== Mohan Mukhiya S/O Late Jagarnath Mukhiya Resident Of Village - Khalwa Tola Piprahiya Kaulapur, P.S. - Yogapatti (Nawalpur), District - West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Yogapatti (Nawalpur) P. S. Case No.175 of 2019, instituted for the offences under Sections 304-B, 201/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 29.08.2019, he is a person with clean antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in this case.

The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the informant alleges that her daughter (deceased) was married to the petitioner three years back. After marriage, the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20676 of 2020(4) dt.08-03-2022 2/2 petitioner and his family members were demanding Rs. One lac and a motorcycle, when the informant showed his inability to fulfil the demand, it is alleged that petitioner along with his family members killed her daughter for non-fulfilment of the demand and the informant came to know about the same on 02.05.2019 from some neighbours of the deceased. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner despite being in custody since 29.08.2019, till date, charges have not been framed.

The learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, seeks permission to withdraw the bail application with a liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T