Raja Raj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 55764 of 2017 Arising out of P.S. Case No.-421 Year-2017 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR District- Muzaffarpur =============================================== Raja Raj, Son of Chhote Lal Sah, Resident of M. Das Gali, MohallaBrahampura, P.S. Brahampura, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s =============================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Verma, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s:

Mr. Ajay Kumar-1, APP.

=============================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 23-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences under Sections 143, 144, 158, 290, 414, 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-b)A, 251A, 251AAA, 26, 26(ii), 35 and 27 of the Arms Act and Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. It is contended that, as per allegation, petitioner is one of the twenty one persons who were arrested from the birthday party as firing was being made by the persons there and illicit liquor was also recovered therefrom. From the petitioner, allegedly two live cartridge of .315 bore was recovered.

It is contended that eight co-accused persons have

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55764 of 2017(2) dt.23-11-2017 2/2 been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. It is urged that the petitioner has remained in custody since 22.08.2017, i.e., about three months. It is claimed that the petitioner is having clean antecedent.

Considering the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Muzaffarpur in connection with Muzaffarpur (Sadar) P.S. Case No. 421 of 2017 with a condition that one of the bailors must be his father and further that one of the bailors of the petitioner(s) must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner.

Further, if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Vikash/- U T