← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19433/2025bail granted

Raja Khan @ Arju Hasan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-07Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16132 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-706 Year-2024 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Pyare Khan @ Rizwankhan Md. Eiliyas R/o Mohalla - Sahjalalpir, P.OSasaram, P.S- Sasaram, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 19433 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-706 Year-2024 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Raja Khan @ Arju Hasan Son of Md. Eiliyas Resident of village- Sahjalalpir, Po- Sasaram, Ps- Sasaram, Dist- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 16132 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nawaz Shareef For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Anita Kumari (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 19433 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nawaz Shareef For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Nath Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 329(4), 76, 352, 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27(A) of the Arms Act.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16132 of 2025(3) dt.07-07-2025 2/3

3. As per F.I.R., the allegation levelled against petitioners and one co-accused is that they entered in the house of informant and started abusing her and also tried to outrage her modesty.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence, as alleged in the F.I.R., ever took place. He further submits that prior to the alleged occurrence, the sister of co-accused Chandani Praveen lodged an F.I.R., vide Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 705 of 2024 against son of informant and in retailiation, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Allegation is general and omnibus.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 706 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16132 of 2025(3) dt.07-07-2025 3/3 Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T