Anil Rai v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37659 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3173 Year- 2012 Thana -SARAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSARAN ====================================================== Anil Rai, son of Ram Dabin Rai, R/o Village Motichapra, P.S. Baniapur, District Saran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Guria Devi, wife of Anil Rai, R/o Village Motichapra, P.S. Baniapur, District Saran, presently resided at Village Chainpur Chamaria, P.S. Masrakh, District Saran.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghwendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 27-07-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case is likely to be compromised. Learned counsel for the complainant also submits that it was resolved that the matter should be settled amicably.

Considering the willingness of the petitioner and the complainant to resolve the dispute amicably, the above named petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below within four weeks from today and the court below shall, after issuing notice to the complainant, grant provisional bail to the petitioner for a

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37659 of 2014 (7) dt.27-07-2015 2/2 period of four months on furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Chapra in Complaint Case No. 3173 of 2012, corresponding to Tr. No. 2436/2013.

The court below shall make all efforts for reconciliation of the dispute between the husband and the wife. If the dispute is resolved amicably between the parties, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed. In case the dispute is not resolved, the court below shall pass orders on the prayer for provisional bail of the petitioner on its own merit in accordance with law.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Dilip/- U T