Raja Ray @ Raja Rai @ Raja Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19648 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2020 Thana- PATORI District- Samastipur ====================================================== RAJA RAY @ RAJA RAI @ RAJA KUMAR Son of Ram Ekbal Ray @ Ram Ekbal Roy @ Ramekwal Ray R/o village - Lodipur Mohanpur, P.S. - Shahpur Patori, Dist. - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 09-01-2023 No one appears for the petitioner. Learned APP for the State is present.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 363, 366 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, two accused persons came on two motorcycles and it is stated by the informant that they took away his daughter-in-law and grandson with them. The informant further states that he came to learn from the covillagers that the accused persons were involved in selling of women.

From perusal of the petition it transpires that the case of the petitioner is that he has been falsely implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19648 of 2022(4) dt.09-01-2023 2/2 case. There is no specific allegation against him. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. The victim is a married lady who was having a love affair with someone as a result of which she fled away. The FIR was registered after an unexplained inordinate delay. Co-accused Bikky Ray has been enlarged on bail. The petitioner is in custody since 21.1.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State who submits that the daughter-in-law and grandson of the informant are still traceless.

Having heard learned APP for the State and having perused the material on record, in view of the fact that the allegation is of relationship between the daughter-in-law of the informant and the petitioner and the daughter-in-law and the grandson of the informant still being traceless, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Spd/- U T