Pawan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18415 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2025 Thana- Sikandarpur District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Pawan Singh S/O Nand Kishore Singh Resident of village - Dorapur Sahebganj, P.S- Rajepur, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raju Kumar, Advocate :

Mr. Shubham Samrat, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-03-2026 Heard Mr. Raju Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 19.10.2025 in connection with Sikandarpur P.S. Case No. 151 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 18.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner allegedly went to the house of informant's sister and assaulted the informant and her two minor daughter by means of gas rubber pipe and stick and further threatened to kill them and attempted to throw the children into Budhi Gandak River but the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18415 of 2026(2) dt.24-03-2026 2/3 local people intervened and rescued them.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. It appears from the FIR that due to some petty dispute the present occurrence has taken place. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted the informant and her minor daughters but the injury report of the injured persons suggest that injury inflicted upon them is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. He further submits that due to spur of moment the present occurrence has taken place and there was no intention to kill anyone and the petitioner is in custody since 19.10.2025.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, petitioner has clean antecedent and injury inflicted upon injured persons is simple in nature, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 3rd District and Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sikandarpur P.S. Case No. 151 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18415 of 2026(2) dt.24-03-2026 3/3 i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T