Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62604/2017bail granted

Ram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-01-11Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62604 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -184 Year- 2017 Thana -MUFFASIL District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Ram Kumar S/o Dinanath Yadav, R/o Village- Rampur, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-01-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in Muffasil P.S. Case No. 184 of 2017 registered for the offence under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 120-B of the I.P.C. and Section 8/10 of the Bihar Conduct of Examination Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of indulging in promoting unfairmeans including two others.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that other co-accused, Ratnesh Kumar, has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench vide order dated 19.12.2017 passed in Cr.Misc. No.61802 of 2017. The petitioner is in custody for three months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62604 of 2017 (2) dt.11-01-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Aurangabad, in Muffasil P.S. Case No. 184 of 2017, subject to the conditions that (1) one of the bailors must be local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (2) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. (3) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U