← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16620/2020bail granted

Sunil Patel v. The State Of Bihar

2020-10-14Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16620 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2020 Thana- BAUSI District- Purnia ====================================================== Sunil Patel, Son of Yodha Patel @ Ramayodhya Patel, Resident of Karhan Hussaini, P.S. - Kesariya, District - Motihari, East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Pathak, Advocate Mr.Jay Prakash Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Braj Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 14-10-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

In the present case, the petitioner is seeking bail in Excise Case No. 35 of 2020 arising out of Baisi P.S. Case No. 14 of 2020, registered for offence punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30 (a), 33, 41, 47 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2016. It is contended that, as per allegation, 8800 liters of spirit were recovered from a Truck, which was being driven by the petitioner. It is urged that the petitioner is in custody since 17.01.2020. It is claimed that his antecedent is clean. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16620 of 2020(5) dt.14-10-2020 2/2 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Purnea in connection with Excise Case No.35 of 2020 arising out of Baisi P.S. Case No. 14 of 2020 with a condition that if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Shivaji Pandey, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T