Punam Devi v. The State Of Bihar, Through The District Magistrate, Madhepura And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3476 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16823 of 2013 ====================================================== Punam Devi W/O Late Dhukhan Sah Duhit R/O Village - Bihariganj Kumar Khand, P.S. Kumar Khand, Distt. Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the District Magistrate, Madhepura.

2. Sri Gopal Meena, the District Magistrate, Madhepura.

3. Sri Sanjay Kumar Nirala, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Madhepura.

4. Sri Shankar Kumar Chaudhary, The Deputy Director (A.G.) Kosi Division, Saharsa-Cum-Project Executive officer, Kumarkhand.

5. Sri Ramlakhan Satyarthi the District Provident Fund Officer, Madhepura. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra For the State : Mr. Manish Kumar, AC to AAG-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 24-01-2018 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated call.

Learned counsel for the State is present and draws attention towards the show cause filed on behalf of the opposite parties submitting that amount of provident fund had already been paid to the petitioner and the order of this court has already been complied with.

In view of the aforesaid facts, this petition stands disposed of. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner is not satisfied with the amount of provident fund calculated by the

Patna High Court MJC No.3476 of 2016 (2) dt.24-01-2018 2/2 concerned authorities, the petitioner may file a representation before the appropriate authority within three months from today and if she does so, the concerned authority shall pass appropriate order on the representation of the petitioner. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U