Prince Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29260 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2019 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani ====================================================== PRINCE SAH, Son of Rajesh Sah, Resident of village - Chourniya Jaran, P.S.-Gayghat, District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Prakash, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-10-2021 Let the defects be removed within two weeks of the complete start of the physical Court.

Heard the parties.

The petitioner is languishing in custody for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission is that the F.I.R. of the occurrence of robbery is against unknown. Name of the petitioner surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused. Besides that there is no other incriminating material against the petitioner and petitioner was not put on T.I. parade during investigation of the case nor any incriminating article was recovered from his possession. Petitioner is in custody since 06.08.2020. Investigation of the case is already complete. Considering lack of sufficient material against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29260 of 2021(2) dt.21-10-2021 2/2 petitioner for further detention as under trial prisoner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Sakari P.S. Case No. 70 of 2019, with following conditions:

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) mantreshwar/- U T