Laxman Rajak v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17601 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3026 Year-2018 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== 1.

Laxman Rajak, Son of Late Ganesh Rajak, Resident of Mohalla- Morcha Road, Patnacity, Police Station- Chowk, District- Patna, 2.

Bimla Devi, Wife of Sri Laxman Rajak, Resident of Mohalla- Morcha Road, Patnacity, Police Station- Chowk, District- Patna. 3.

Munna, Son of Sri Laxman Rajak, Resident of Mohalla- Morcha Road, Patnacity, Police Station- Chowk, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Smt. Shagun Rani @ Khushi Rani, Wife of Pintu Kumar, Daughter of Mr. Sudarshan Prasad, Resident of Village- Haripur Colony,Digha Ghat, P.O. and Police Station- Digha, District- Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dr. Shraddhanand Paswan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-11-2019 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 3026 (C) of 2018, disclosing offences under Section 498A of IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Petitioners happens to be the mother-in-law, father-inlaw and brother-in-law (Devar) of the complainant. Case is under Section 498A of IPC.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that they are the relatives of the husband of the complainant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17601 of 2019(7) dt.19-11-2019 2/2 There is no specific allegation has been attributed against them. As a matter of fact, she does not want to reside with the petitioner.

Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 also, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners on the ground that she is ready to reside with the petitioner.

Having heard both sides, considering the above submission, this application is allowed. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Patna, in connection with Complaint Case No. 3026 (C) of 2018, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with condition that they will not create any obstruction in the way, if the husband wants to reside with the complainant or if there is any chance of amicable settlement between them. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T