Ramesh Sahani @ Ramesh Kumar @ Ramesh Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29892 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2018 Thana- BELSAND District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

Ramesh Sahani @ Ramesh Kumar @ Ramesh Sahni Son Of Raghunandan Sahani Resident Of Village- Seropatti, Ward No. 03, P.S.- Belsand, DistrictSitamarhi. 2.

Vindeshwar Sahni Son Of Raghunandan Sahni Resident Of VillageSeropatti, Ward No. 03, P.S.- Belsand, District- Sitamarhi. 3.

Arun Sahni @ Arun Kumar Son Of Vindeshwar Sahni Resident Of VillageSeropatti, Ward No. 03, P.S.- Belsand, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Pd Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 17-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects, if any, within three weeks. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 307, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners are said to have abused the daughter of the informant and assaulted her by means of stick and fists and slaps as a result of which she became senseless. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. He submits that the informant and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29892 of 2021(4) dt.17-02-2023 2/2 petitioners belong to same family and next door neighbours. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He submits that occurrence took place on 15.11.2018 but the FIR has been lodged on 17.11.2018 after delay of 2 days without explaining any reasonable cause of delay. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Belsand P.S. Case No. 185 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

devendra/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U T