Golu Kumar @ Anshu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18509 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-320 Year-2021 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== GOLU KUMAR @ ANSHU KUMAR SON OF KARI SINGH @ MUKESH SINGH R/O VILLAGE- MADHURAPUR, P.S.- TEGHRA, DISTRICTBEGUSARAI ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anshu Dhar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 07-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 386, 307 and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. As per prosecution case, the informant came to his shop at about 2:00 PM, four persons came on two motorcycles and pointed pistol upon him and he started abusing and demanded money/extortion and fired in the air. It is further alleged that the accused persons assaulted him and fled away. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18509 of 2023(3) dt.07-07-2023 2/2 name of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of his self confessional statement before the police, which has got no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. No extortion money has been executed by the petitioner. No T.I. Parade has been done. He is languishing in judicial custody since 23.10.2022. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned in connection with Teghrha P.S. Case No. 320 of 2021.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T