Vikram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22436 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2022 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai ====================================================== Vikram Singh Son Of Sunil Singh Resident Of 29/A, Hume Pipe Area, P.S.- Sitaramdera, District- East Singhbhum (JHARKHAND) ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madhav Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 1604.475 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that 1604.475 liters wine is recovered from the godown. The name of the petitioner has transpired as being owner of the godown in question. The said godown has already been leased out to Devendra Singh. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding nature of goods kept in the godown. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22436 of 2023(2) dt.16-05-2023 2/2 suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the order dated 13.04.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 626 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari versus State of Bihar). On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. case No. 271 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T